1. جمالی، محمد، گوهری، سید علیرضا، اخوان صراف، غزل. (۱۴۰۳). تحلیل روندهای زمانی و مکانی شاخصهای حدی دما و بارش در ایران. مدیریت آب و آبیاری، دوره 14، شماره 3، صفحه 752-743. https://doi.org/10.22059/JWIM.2024.374814.1156
2. چوبه، سپیده، فرخ زاده ، بهنوش، بذر افشان ، ام البنین، حسن وند، هانیه. (۱۴۰۴). واکاوی تغییرات زمانی و مکانی شاخصهای حدی بارش تحت تأثیر تغییر اقلیم در ایران. پژوهش های آبخیزداری، دوره 37، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 145، صفحه 34-53 https://doi.org/10.22092/wmrj.2024.364521.1565
3. حسنی، محمد رضا. ، نیک سخن، محمد حسین ، اردستانی، مجتبی.، موسوی جنبهسرایی، سید. فرید. (۱۴۰۱). ارزیابی اثرات تغییر اقلیم بر رواناب شهری بر اساس مدلهای CMIP6. (مطالعه موردی: منطقه ۱۰ شهرداری تهران). مدلسازی و مدیریت آب و خاک، ۳(۲)، ۲۶۹–۲۸۵. (https://doi.org/10.22098/mmws.2022.11849.1176)
4. ذوالفقاری، حسن، و فتاحی، ابراهیم. (۱۳۹۰). تحلیل فضایی مخاطرات محیطی. فصلنامه جغرافیا و مخاطرات محیط طبیعی، ۵(۳)، ۱–۲۲. (https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=40391)
5. روشنی، ادیب.، حمیدی، مهدی. (۱۴۰۰). پیشبینی اثرات سناریوهای تغییر اقلیم بر دما و بارش بر اساس مدلهای CMIP6 (مطالعه موردی: ایستگاه ساری). مجله مدیریت آب و آبیاری، دوره 11، شماره 4، صفحه 795-781. https://doi.org/10.22059/jwim.2022.330603.920)
6. رضائی، حسن.، پاشاپور، حجت الله.، و صادقی، فرشید. (۱۴۰۳). ارزیابی عملکرد مدلهای CMIP6 و پیشنگری تغییرات دما و بارش تحت سناریوهای خط سیر اجتماعی-اقتصادی مشترک (SSP) در ایران. فصلنامه آیندهپژوهی راهبردی، ۳ (۱۰)، ۷–۳۰. (https://jsfs.sndu.ac.ir/article_2944.html)
7. شجاع, فائزه و شمسی پور, علی اکبر . (1402). پیشنمایی تغییرات بارشهای آتی حوضههای آبخیز تأمینکننده آب شهر تهران. مخاطرات محیط طبیعی, 12(36), 151-180. doi: 10.22111/jneh.2022.42622.1908
8. عبدالعلیزاده، علی، خورشیددوست، علیمحمد، و جهانبخشاصل، سعید. (۱۴۰۲). پیشنگری و ارزیابی روند دما، بارش و خشکسالی حوضه آبریز دریاچه ارومیه. مجله پژوهشهای جغرافیای طبیعی، ۵۵(۱)، ۹۵–۱۱۲. https://doi.org/10.22034/hyd.2023.56103.1687
9. عساکره، حسین، لیونلو، پیرو، میرموسوی، سید حسین، صدرافشاری، سحر، 1401، شبیه سازی تغییرات دما در نیمه غربی ایران طی دوره ( 1960-2100 )با استفاده از مدل های واکاوی شده و خروجی مدل RCP8.5 ، نشریه تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی، شماره 66 ، صص 1-17. ( https://doi.org/10.52547/jgs.22.66.1)
10. فرزانه، مهسا، اربابی سبزواری، آزاده، دریاباری، سیدجمال الدین، اسدیان، فریده، 1400، پیش نگری متغیرهای اقلیمی دهه های آینده در پهنه جنوب شرق ایران، نشریه پژوهش های اقلیم شناسی، ش 45،صص 112-97 .
11. کریمی، حسین بهزادی . (۱۳۹۷). واکاوی پهنههای اقلیمی و خطر بیابانزایی حوضه آبریز کارون تحت شرایط تغییر اقلیم آینده با استفاده از شاخص UNEP. فصلنامه جغرافیا و مخاطرات محیط طبیعی، ۱۲(۲)، ۱–۲۷. (https://geoeh.um.ac.ir/article_77881.html)
12. کوزه گران، سعیده، موسوی بایگی، محمد، 1393، بررسی روند رویدادهای حدی اقلیمی در شمال شرق ایران، نشریه آب و خاک (علوم و صنایع کشاورزی)، 750- دوره 29 ، شماره 3، ،ص. 764-750. https://doi.org/10.22067/jsw.v0i0.40845
13. طلابی، محسن، عزیزیان، ابوالفضل، پورمحمدی، سمانه، یرمی، نجمه، 1401، اثر تغییر اقلیم بر بارش، دما و کیفیت آب سطحی در حوزه اسکندری اصفهان، نشریه پژوهش های اقلیم شناسی، ش 50، صص 134 – 121. https://clima.irimo.ir/article_156453.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com
14. محمدی، نیلوفر.، و حجازیزاده، زهرا. (۱۴۰۳). اثرات تغییر اقلیم بر افزایش ریسک مخاطره خشکسالی در تهران با بهرهگیری از سناریوهای CMIP6. مدلسازی و مدیریت آب و خاک، 4(۲)، ۱۳۳–۱۴۸. (https://doi.org/10.22098/mmws.2023.12563.1252)
15. نساجی زواره، مجتبی، قرمز چشمه، باقر، 1398، بررسی روند تغییرات شاخص های بارش و فرصت های مناسب برای استحصال آب باران (مطالعه موردی ناحیه خزر)، مجله سامانه های سطوح ابگیر باران. ۱۰، (۱) :۲۷-۴۰. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.24235970.1401.10.1.2.1
16. Aguilar, E., Peterson, T. C., Obando, P. R., Frutos, R., Retana, J. A., Solera, M. Mayorga, R. (2005). Changes in precipitation and temperature extremes in Central America and northern South America, 1961–2003. Journal of Geophysical Research, 110, D23107. (https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006119)
17. Ahmadalipour, A., & Moradkhani, H. (2023). Evaluation of CMIP6 GCMs for precipitation simulation in arid and semi-arid regions. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 24(5), 123–135. (https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-22-0194.1)
18. Alizadeh, M. R., Adamowski, J., & Manzoor, Q. (2022). Multi-scenario multi-objective analysis of downscaled shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs) for robust policy development in coupled human-water systems. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. (https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-297)
19. Benedict, I., Heerwaarden, C. C. V., Weerts, A. H., & Hazeleger, W. (2019). The benefits of spatial resolution increase in global simulations of the hydrological cycle evaluated for the Rhine and Mississippi basins. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1779–1800. (https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1779-2019)
20. Chaparinia, F., Hadei, M., Yaghmaeian, K., Hadi, M., & Naddafi, K. (2025). Evaluation of climate indices related to water resources in Iran over the past 3 decades. Scientific Reports, 15, 11846 (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-95370-7)
21. Dogiso, G., et al. (2025). Spatio-temporal patterns of extreme rainfall under SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5 scenarios in Ethiopia. Scientific Reports, 15, 3456. (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-02408-x)
22. Donat, M. G., Lowry, A. L., Alexander, L. V., O’Gorman, P. A., & Maher, N. (2016). More extreme precipitation in the world’s dry and wet regions. Nature Climate Change, 6, 508–513. )http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2941(
23. Eden, J. M., Widmann, M., Grawe, D., & Rast, S. (2012). Skill, correction, and downscaling of GCM-simulated precipitation. Journal of Climate, 25(11), 3970–3984. (https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00254.1)
24. Eyring, V., Bony, S., Meehl, G. A., Senior, C. A., Stevens, B., Stouffer, R. J., & Taylor, K. E. (2016). Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization. Geoscientific Model Development, 9, 1937–1958.)https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016(
25. Feng, L., Zhou, T., Wu, B., & Dong, L. (2023). Future changes in extreme precipitation characteristics based on CMIP6 simulations .Journal of Climate, 36(5), 1551–1570. (https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-22-0312.1)
26. Feng, X., Huang, R., & Zhang, L. (2023). Historical and future assessment of extreme precipitation using CMIP6 datasets. International Journal of Climatology, 43(9), 4920–4938. (https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/joc.8077)
27. Feng, Z., Dong, L., & Zhao, Y. (2023). Global projections of extreme precipitation based on CMIP6 models under different SSP scenarios. Climate Dynamics, 60(4), 3211–3230
28. FentaMekonnen, D., & Disse, M. (2018). Analyzing the future climate change of Upper Blue Nile River basin using statistical downscaling techniques. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2391–2408. (https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2391-2018)
29. Gründemann, G. J., van de Giesen, N., Brunner, L., & van der Ent, R. (2022). Rarest rainfall events will see the greatest relative increase in magnitude under future climate change. Communications Earth & Environment, 3(1), 235. (https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00558-8)
30. Gründemann, G. J., van der Schrier, G., & Tank, A. M. G. K. (2022). Projected changes in global precipitation extremes based on CMIP6 models. Climate Dynamics, 59(1–2), 423–442. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05998-5)
31. Gudmundsson, L.; Bremnes, J.B.; Haugen, J.E.; Engen-Skaugen, T. Technical Note: 2012, Downscaling RCM precipitation to the station scale using statistical transformations—A comparison of methods. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 3383–3390. (https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-3383-2012)
32. Gu, Z., Li, Y., Qin, M., Ji, K., Yi, Q., Li, P., & Feng, D. (2024). Spatiotemporal variation characteristics of extreme precipitation in Henan Province based on RClimDex model. Atmosphere, 15, 1399. (https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15111399)
33. Guo, Y., Chen, H., Xu, Y., & Zhou, T. (2023). Projected intensification of heavy precipitation under CMIP6 scenarios. Environmental Research Letters, 18(2), 024036. (https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acb44f)
34. Guo, Y., Li, X., & Wang, J. (2023). Global projections of extreme precipitation under CMIP6 and SSP scenarios. Earth System Science Data, 15, 2235–2256. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004223002560)
35. Hassan, Z., Shamsudin, S., & Harun, S. (2014). Application of SDSM and LARS-WG for simulating and downscaling of rainfall and temperature. Theor. Appl. Climatol., 116, 243–257. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-013-1010-7)
36. Hempel, S., Frieler, L., Schewe, J., & Piontek, F. (2013). A trend-preserving bias correction—the ISI-MIP approach. Earth Syst Dyn, 4, 219–236. (https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-4-219-2013)
37. Herath, S., & Behera, S. K. (2020). Changing rainfall extremes over South Asia and their impacts on water resources. Environmental Research Letters, 15(6), 064015
38. Huang, H., Cui, H., & Ge, Q. (2021). Assessment of potential risks induced by increasing extreme precipitation under climate change. Natural Hazards, 108(2), 2059-2079.
39. Huang, J., et al. (2020). Bias correction of climate model outputs for hydrological modeling: a review. Environmental Research Letters, 15(8), 083001. (https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab88b0)
40. Huang, J., Li, Y., Zhang, Z., Zhang, W., & Chen, X. (2021). Hydroclimatic risks in arid and semi-arid regions under global warming. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 2(9), 600–614. (https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00209-y)
41. Humphries, U. W., Waqas, M., Hlaing, P. T., Dechpichai, P., & Wangwongchai, A. (2024). Assessment of CMIP6 GCMs for selecting a suitable climate model for precipitation projections in Southern Thailand. Results in Engineering, 23, 102417. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102417)
42. Im, E. S., Jung, I. W., & Bae, D. H. (2011). The temporal and spatial structures of recent and future trends in extreme indices over Korea from a regional climate projection. International Journal of Climatology, 31(1), 72–86. (https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.2017)
43. IPCC. (1995). Climate Change 1994. Houghton, J. T., Meira Filho, L. G., Bruce, J. P., Lee, H., Callender, B. T., & Haites, E. F.
44. IPCC AR6. (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.
45. Jain, S., Salunke, P., Mishra, S. K., & Sahany, S. (2019). Performance of CMIP5 models in the simulation of Indian summer monsoon. Theor. Appl. Climatol., 137, 1429–1447. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-018-2542-3)
46. Kamruzzaman, M., et al. (2021). Comparison of CMIP6 and CMIP5 model performance in simulating historical precipitation and temperature in Bangladesh: A preliminary study. Theor. Appl. Climatol., 145, 1385–1406.(https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-021-03500-9)
47. Kamruzzaman, M., et al. (2022). Assessment of CMIP6 global climate models in reconstructing rainfall climatology of Bangladesh. Int. J. Climatol., 42(7), 3928–3953. (https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7404)
48. Karl, T. R., & Knight, R. W. (1997). The 1995 Chicago heat wave: How likely is a recurrence. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 78, 1107–1119. (https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477%281997%29078)<1107:TCHWHL>2.0.CO;2(
49. Khaing, M., Zin, W. W., San, Z. M. L. T., Thiha, S., & Shrestha, M. (2025). Analysis of trends and variability in frequency and intensity indices of precipitation over Myanmar during 1985–2020. Innovation in Engineering, 2(1), 73–90. (https://doi.org/10.58712/ie.v2i1.33).
50. Kim, S., Shin, J.-Y., Lee, G., Park, J., & Sung, K. (2025). Future changes in precipitation extremes over South Korea based on observations and CMIP6 SSP scenarios. Water, 17, 1702. (https://doi.org/10.3390/w17111702)
51. Knutti, R. (2008). Why are climate models reproducing the observed global surface warming so well? Geophys. Res. Lett., 35(18), L18704. (https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034932)
52. Kyselý, J., & Beranová, R. (2009). Climate-change effects on extreme precipitation in central Europe: uncertainties of scenarios based on regional climate models. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 95(3), 361-374. ( https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s00704-008-0014-8)
53. Luo, N., et al. (2022). Added value of CMIP6 models over CMIP5 models in simulating the climatological precipitation extremes in China. Int. J. Climatol., 42(2), 1148–1164. (https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7250)
54. Maraun, D., et al. (2010). Precipitation downscaling under climate change: Recent developments to bridge the gap between dynamical models and the end user. Rev. Geophys., 48(3), RG3003. (https://doi.org/10.1029/2009RG000314)
55. Maraun, D., Wetterhall, F., Ireson, A. M., Chandler, R. E., Kendon, E. J., Widmann, M. Brienen, S. (2017). Precipitation downscaling under climate change: Recent developments to bridge the gap between dynamical models and the end user. Reviews of Geophysics, 55(3), 500–536. (https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RG000548)
56. Meresa, H., Tischbein, B., & Mekonnen, T. (2022). Climate change impact on extreme precipitation and peak flood magnitude and frequency: observations from CMIP6 and hydrological models. Natural Hazards, 111(3), 2649-2679. (http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-021-05152-3)
57. Min, K., Win, W. Z., Tin San, Z. M. L., Soe, T., & Shresth, M. (2025). Analysis of trends and variability in frequency and intensity indices of precipitation over Myanmar during 1985–2020. Innovation in Engineering, 2(2), 73–90. (https://doi.org/10.58712/ie.v2i1.33)
58. Mirzaei, M., et al. (2025). Regional analysis of extreme rainfall using CMIP6 and SSP pathways. Journal of Climate Research, 28, 101–120. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212095525000987)
59. Mondal, A., Kundu, S., & Mukhopadhyay, A. (2012). Rainfall trend analysis by Mann-Kendall test: A case study of north-eastern part of Cuttack District, Orassia. International Journal of Geology, Earth and Environmental Sciences, 2(1), 70–78. (https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21849.36963)
60. Nash, J. E., & Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970). River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 10(3), 282–290. (https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694%2870%2990255-6)
61. O’Neill, B. C., et al. (2020). Achievements and needs for the climate change scenario framework. Nat. Clim. Chang., 10, 1074–1084. (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0901-2)
62. Orlowsky, B., & Seneviratne, S. I. (2012). Global changes in extreme events: Regional and seasonal dimension. Clim. Change, 110, 669–696. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0122-9)
63. Peng, S., Wang, C., Zhan, L., Mihara, K., Kuramochi, K., Toma, Y., & Hatano, R. (2023). Climate change multi‑model projections in CMIP6 scenarios in Central Hokkaido, Japan. Scientific Reports. (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-27357-7)
64. Perez, J., Menendez, M., Mendez, F. J., & Losada, I. J. (2014). Evaluating the performance of CMIP3 and CMIP5 global climate models over the north-east Atlantic region. Clim. Dyn., 43, 2663–2680. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2083-6)
65. Pierce David, Cayan. Daniel R, Feldman.Daniel R, Risser. Mark.D., (2023). Updated projections of extreme precipitation in North America from CMIP6. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 24(5), 1146–1167. (https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-22-0194.1)
66. Rahimpour, A., Mirzaei, M., & Hosseini, Z. (2022). Assessment of urban flood risk under climate change scenarios using extreme precipitation indices: A case study of Tehran. Iranian Journal of Hydrology and Climate Change, 9(2), 45–63.
67. Riahi, K., van Vuuren, D. P., Kriegler, E., Edmonds, J., O'Neill, B. C., Fujimori, S., Bauer, N., Calvin, K., Dellink, R., Fricko, O., Lutz, W., Popp, A., Crespo Cuaresma, J., Samir, K. C., Leimbach, M., Jiang, L., Kram, T., Rao, S., Emmerling, J., Ebi, K., Hasegawa, T., Havlik, P., Humpenöder, F., Da Silva, L. A., Smith, S., Stehfest, E., Bosetti, V., Eom, J., Gernaat, D., Masui, T., Rogelj, J., Strefler, J., Drouet, L., Krey, V., Luderer, G., Harmsen, M., Takahashi, K., Baumstark, L., Doelman, J., Kainuma, M., Klimont, Z., Marangoni, G., Lotze-Campen, H., Obersteiner, M., Tabeau, A., & Tavoni, M. (2017). The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. Global Environmental Change, 42, 153–168. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009)
68. Salmi, T., Maatta, A., Anttila, P., Ruoho-Airola, T., & Amnell, T. (2002). Detecting trends of annual values of atmospheric pollutants by the Mann-Kendall test and Sen’s slope estimates—The Excel template application MAKESENS. Helsinki.( https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259356944)
69. Sillmann, J., Kharin, V. V., Zwiers, F. W., Zhang, X., & Bronaugh, D. (2013). Climate extremes indices in the CMIP5 multimodel ensemble: Part 1. Model evaluation in the present climate. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 118(4), 1716–1733. (https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50203)
70. Shrestha, S., Shrestha, M., & Babel, M. S. (2015). Modelling the potential impacts of climate change on hydrology of Indrawati River Basin in Nepal. *Environmental Earth Science. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-5150-8)
71. Schoof, J. T. (2013). Statistical downscaling in climatology. Geol. Compass, 7, 249–265. (https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12032)
72. Schoof, J. T., Van de Vyver, H., & Berckmans, J. (2025). Thermodynamic and dynamic contributions to heavy precipitation changes in Europe. Climate Dynamics, 64(3), 1347–1362
73. Schoofs, J., Vandelanotte, K., Van de Vyver, H., Van Der Sichel, L., Vandersteene, M., Serras, F., … Van Schaeybroeck, B. (2025). Dynamic and thermodynamic contributions to future extreme-rainfall intensification: a case study for Belgium. Physics and Astronomy. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.02436
74. Sensoy, S., Turkoglu, N., Akcakaya, A., Ekikici, M., Ulupinar, Y., Atay, H., & Tuvan, A., Demirbas, H. (2013). Trends in Turkey climate indices from 1960 to 2010. 6th Atmospheric Science Symposium – ATMOS 2013, Istanbul. (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289520845)
75. Smith, J., & Johnson, K. (2024). Challenges in rainfall prediction using GCMs: A review. Climate Dynamics, 62(3), 567–580. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-023-07261-4)
76. Subba, S., Ma, Y., & Ma, W. (2019). Spatial and temporal analysis of precipitation extremities of Eastern Nepal in the last two decades (1997–2016). Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 124(14), 7523–7539. (https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030639)
77. Su, B., et al. (2021). Insight from CMIP6 SSP-RCP scenarios for future drought characteristics in China. Atmos. Res., 250, 105375. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105375)
78. Sun, W., Li, J., Yu, R., Li, N., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Exploring changes of precipitation extremes under climate change through global variable-resolution modeling. Science Bulletin, 69(2), 237-247.
79. Taylor, K. E. (2001). Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 106, 7183–7192. (https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900719)
80. Teutschbein, C., & Seibert, J. (2012). Bias correction of regional climate model simulations for hydrological climate-change impact studies: Review and evaluation of different methods. Journal of Hydrology, 456–457, 12–29. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.05.052)
81. Wang, C., Yang, W., Vecchi, G. A., Zhang, B., Soden, B. J., & Chan, D. (2025). Diagnosing the factors that contribute to the intermodel spread of climate feedback in CMIP6. Journal of Climate, 38(3), 663–674. (https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-23-0528.1).
82. Wood, A. W., Leung, L. R., Sridhar, V., & Lettenmaier, D. (2004). Hydrologic implications of dynamical and statistical approaches to downscaling climate model outputs. Clim. Change, 62, 189–216. (https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CLIM.0000013685.09478.24)
83. Yazdandoost, F., et al. (2021). Evaluation of CMIP6 precipitation simulations across different climatic zones: Uncertainty and model intercomparison. Atmos. Res., 250, 105369. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105369)
84. Yuanlan Wang, Bai, X., Lei, Y., Ding, W., & Wu, S. (2025). The projection of extreme heat and precipitation events in China response to global warming under the SSP1-2.6 and SSP5-8.5 scenarios. International Journal of Climatology, 0, e8807. (https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.8807)
85. Zhang, X., Zwiers, F. W., & Hegerl, G. C. (2009). The use of indices to characterize extreme events. In Climate Extremes and Their Implications (pp. 77–104). Springer. (https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69391-2_5)
86. Zhao, L., Chen, H., & Liu, Y. (2023). Future changes in extreme precipitation over North America using CMIP6 SSP scenarios. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 24(5), 1123–1145. (https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/hydr/24/5/JHM-D-22-0194.1.xml)
